Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2647758@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE  (Nis Jørgensen <nis@superlativ.dk>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't have handy a spec guide.  Does this mean that MySQL
>> is indeed showing incorrect behavior?
>
> I think this is really outside the spec.
[...]
> There is not anything I can see addressing whether an
> "update" should or should not be considered to occur if a
> target column happens to not change as a result of a
> commanded update.

Moreover, I can think of one argument why an UPDATE that
does not change the value of the row should still occur:
There may be an ON UPDATE trigger on the table that you
expect to fire whether or not the UPDATE was "optimized
away".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL spec/implementation question: UPDATE
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Out of memory with ODBC