Re: [GENERAL] Undetected corruption of table files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Undetected corruption of table files
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C222079E@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Undetected corruption of table files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would it be an option to have a checksum somewhere in each
>> data block that is verified upon read?
>
> That's been proposed before and rejected before.  See the archives ...

I searched for "checksum" and couldn't find it. Could someone
give me a pointer? I'm not talking about WAL files here.

Thanks,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Insufficient attention to security in contrib (mostly)
Next
From: "Marko Kreen"
Date:
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto