Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> After reading this interesting article on shared_buffers and wal_buffers:
> http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
>
> it got me wondering if my settings were ideal. Is there some way to
> measure wal_buffer usage in real time, so that I could simply monitor
> it for some period of time, and then come up with a way of determining
> if the current setting is sufficient?
>
> I tried googling, but every reference that I've found simply defaults
> to the "trial & error" approach to performance tuning.
You can use the contrib module pg_buffercache to inspect the shared buffers.
If almost all your shared buffers have high use count (4 or 5),
shared_buffers may be too small. If not, consider reducing shared_buffers.
It's probably better to start with a moderate value and tune upwards.
You can also look at pg_statio_all_tables and pg_statio_all_indexes and
calculate the buffer hit ratio. If that is low, that's also an indication
that shared_buffers is too small.
You should distinguish between tables and indexes:
it is usually more important that indexes are cached.
Try to observe these things over time, for example by taking
snapshots every n minutes and storing the results in a table.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
