Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MauMau
Subject Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations
Date
Msg-id D918162F7E8947E4936A14B3A0B17D50@maumau
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Please find attached the revised patch.  I failed to change SIGUSR1 to
SIGUSR2 when sending sinval catchup signal.

In addition, I changed wal sender to not receive SIGUSR1/2 from
SendProcSignal().  Without this, wal sender will excessively wake up or
terminate by the signals.  This is an existing problem.

Regards
MauMau
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: gaussian distribution pgbench -- splits v4
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: gaussian distribution pgbench -- splits v4