Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date
Msg-id D90F69A8-63E4-49C2-BFB2-F07FC958CCD5@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> +1.  However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had
>> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore
>> in 9.2:
>
> Fair enough.

Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?

Best,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpoints are duplicated even while the system is idle
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters