> On 26 Jun 2019, at 15:09, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-14 10:47, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The warning about using ident for authorization or access control is using a
>> <blockquote> with an <attribution> rather than a <warning>, making it look
>> quite different from the rest of the manual, and less like a warning IMO.
>
> But this is a quote from the RFC. If you want to change it to a warning
> box, then you also need to rephrase the surrounding text. But I don't
> really see the need. It seems fine as it is.
It is indeed a quote, but to my reading/understanding the only reason we’ve
included it is to act as a warning? Thats why the formatting stood out as it’s
not consistent for warnings. The attached v2 instead wraps the quote in a
<warning> with a slight rewording to make it even more prominent.
cheers ./daniel
