Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable
Date
Msg-id D51838FE-BA46-460A-A715-5D4A7F57DB0E@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable  (Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 5 Jun 2023, at 09:22, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote:

> Please see attached the patch that introduces this new feature.

This patch fails the guc_check test due to something missing in the sample
configuration.  Please send a rebased version with this test fixed.

[08:31:26.680] --- stdout ---
[08:31:26.680] # executing test in /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/build/testrun/test_misc/003_check_guc group test_misc test
003_check_guc
[08:31:26.680] not ok 1 - no parameters missing from postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] ok 2 - no parameters missing from guc_tables.c
[08:31:26.680] ok 3 - no parameters marked as NOT_IN_SAMPLE in postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] 1..3
[08:31:26.680] # test failed

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits