> I think you misread that ;-). What I was saying was that there wasn't
> (any longer) anything outside plpgsql that would prevent it from
> returning sets. There would be a nontrivial amount of work to do
inside
> plpgsql to make it happen; see Jan's followup
Thanks for the clarification. :)
> > It's over a year later. What's the status today?
>
> About the same.
>
> There is support in 7.2 for plpgsql functions to return references to
> cursors. This is not by any means the same thing as a SETOF result,
> but it can serve some of the same purposes.
I'll look into this to see if it can do what I want. Or if I can do
what it wants!
eric
