Re: \d very, very, very slow - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sam Liddicott
Subject Re: \d very, very, very slow
Date
Msg-id D38A0FCD5830E848992DF2D4AF5F6F4FE22508@conwy.leeds.ananova.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to \d very, very, very slow  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Responses Installing postgresql
List pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 04 August 2002 06:52
> To: Steve Atkins
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] \d very, very, very slow
>
>
> Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> writes:
> > So is 15-20 seconds for \d unusual?
>
> Very.
>
> > If so, where should I start looking to see what's broken?
>
> Well, what query plans are used for the queries issued by \d on each
> of your two boxes?  Have you done ANALYZE or VACUUM ANALYZE lately?
> (Out-of-date stats about the system tables might lead the planner to
> make a stupid choice of query plan.)

We find that sometimes pgadmin takes this long to show us DB details when we
double click on a DB and we vacuum analyse every night.

This ispostgres 7.2.1

Sam




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: index and sequence name length limit?
Next
From: "jeff"
Date:
Subject: Installing postgresql