Re: Adding CI to our tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date
Msg-id D25D29F0-CBF1-44D3-81E1-6622E5C295D9@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding CI to our tree  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 14 Dec 2021, at 05:11, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2021-12-14 16:51:58 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I'd better go and figure out how to fix cfbot when this lands...
>
> I assume it'd be:
> - stop adding the CI stuff
> - adjust links to CI tasks, appveyor wouldn't be used anymore
> - perhaps reference individual tasks from the cfbot page?

+1 on leveraging the CI tasks in the tree in the CFBot.  For a patch like the
libnss TLS backend one it would be a great help to both developer and reviewer
to have that codepath actually built and tested as part of the CFBot; being
able to tweak the CI tasks used in the CFBot per patch would be very helpful.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side