> On 14 Dec 2021, at 05:11, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2021-12-14 16:51:58 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I'd better go and figure out how to fix cfbot when this lands...
>
> I assume it'd be:
> - stop adding the CI stuff
> - adjust links to CI tasks, appveyor wouldn't be used anymore
> - perhaps reference individual tasks from the cfbot page?
+1 on leveraging the CI tasks in the tree in the CFBot. For a patch like the
libnss TLS backend one it would be a great help to both developer and reviewer
to have that codepath actually built and tested as part of the CFBot; being
able to tweak the CI tasks used in the CFBot per patch would be very helpful.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
