RE: PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra) |
---|---|
Subject | RE: PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x |
Date | |
Msg-id | D21A20CD84607E409F314E31F0F68D8A0E6589@cricket-be.ento.csiro.au. Whole thread Raw |
In response to | PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x (Pätzke Axel (external)<Axel.Paetzke.external@kst.siemens.de>) |
Responses |
RE: PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x
|
List | pgsql-general |
Hi All Correct me if I'm wrong Oracle features not yet on postgresql Good Backup utilities, Backup backup API (compare the speed of a large dump on oracle to postgresql) Binary (fast) dump utility fine grained control of the filesystem layout from within the DB fine grained control of table spaces fine grained control of how the table_space grows ie no increase, increase by an decreasing/increasing amounts etc. Parrellel server (cluster storing a single DB) Allowing some queries to be sped up by throwing more machines at the problem. Threaded db backend allowing some queries to be speed up by throwing more processors at the problem. As far as I'm concerned thats about it. Currently the only ones that I would like to see fixed in the short term would be Online Backups followed by backups in general. The rest of the stuff on this list is not needed by 99% of people (but still nice to point to). What makes oracle the first choice is that by recommending it you use the "Nobody got fired for buying IBM" school, it is expensive, support is good and the CEO has heard of it. If you do use postgresql. Make sure that other people appreciate the alternatives and their cost beforehand, present it as a calculated risk, you are taking a risk on a technology that can give your company a competitive edge however as it is a new technology that may not have been tested in the role that you're anticipating. Be aggressive but don't be blinkered by your preference as well. Postgresql is a great product and very close to being a 24*7 product I don't think it quiet there yet. Postgresql is more advanced in a number of areas as well -- Ian Willis -----Original Message----- From: Pätzke Axel (external) [mailto:Axel.Paetzke.external@kst.siemens.de] Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2001 5:11 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x Hello everybody out there, does anybody of you have experience with PostgreSQL 7.1 and ORACLE 8.x running simultaneously on the same server (Linux: Kernel 2.2.16), and could they be connected in any way to share some data ? As a beginner in client-server achitectured databases ( I only have a couple of years experience in programming PARADOX & ACCES databases), I also have the question, where are the main differences - except there is an open source software on the one hand and a commercial on the other - between these two databases? What does make ORACLE to be the first choice ? Under what kind of circumstances could be PostgreSQL the first choice ? After all: What are the main missing functions in PostgreSQL to put it to the same level as ORACLE - or does it still be ? If not: Will there be a chance in the near future, that I can supersede an ORACLE- database with a PostgreSQL one, under any circumstances ? I really don't want to start a database flame; all I want to get is a general overview based upon your experience - and yes, I have read the manuals allready, but maybe not everything in detail :-). Thank´s for care and for helping me along Kind regards Axel "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
pgsql-general by date: