RE: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)
Subject RE: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions
Date
Msg-id D21A20CD84607E409F314E31F0F68D8A0E6381@cricket-be.ento.csiro.au.
Whole thread Raw
In response to Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions  (Orion Henry <orion@trustcommerce.com>)
List pgsql-general
On linux the software raid will use the MMX instructions, can't these be
done in parrell to most other operations? Memory bandwidth may be the real
killer


--
Ian Willis
Systems Administrator
Division of Entomology CSIRO
GPO Box 1700
Canberra ACT 2601
ph  02 6246 4391
fax 02 6246 4000


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Wolfe [mailto:steve@iboats.com]
Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2001 10:48 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions


> It's not surprising to see software raid outperforming hardware raid (both
> of modern vintage).

  That's provided, of course, that you have a good amount of free CPU
cycles.  On machines that are otherwise heavily CPU-loaded, software raid
has been (in my experience) horrible.

steve



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: IDE or RAD tools