Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Date
Msg-id D15F64EC-6130-40A5-9039-D2096443EAAB@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On July 9, 2015 9:13:20 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:

>Unfortunately I don't know what that means about the API.  Does it mean
>that none of the functions declared in any .h file can have their
>signatures changed?  But new functions can be added?

That's the safest way. Sometimes you can decide that a function can not sanely be called by external code and thus
changethe signature. But I'd rather not risk or here, IRS quite possible that one pod these is used by a extension.
 

Andres

--- 
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Waits monitoring