-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:13:30 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> So why haven't we just blocked mx3.cc.teu.ac.jp at the firewall?
Several reasons, but foremost ... until Magnus pointed out the need to change
450 -> 550, nobody knew they were hitting us ... but, I just checked the log
file, and that is the only address that that host has tried to get through, so
would be a bit overkill to block one host for retrying one address repeatedly
because we didn't tell them it was a permanent failure vs temporary one, no? :)
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHFPOm4QvfyHIvDvMRAlOpAJ4sYXvzcv4yV/q6sionUvxmUjzxnwCdEw1J
Lg5S/QQ321e7t/F2cMZHL/I=
=lhKG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
