Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas F.O'Connell
Subject Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.
Date
Msg-id D143E213-DFAC-11D8-A715-000D93AE0944@sitening.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.  (chinni <naveen.bysani@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
See http://www.slony.org/

It's a master-multislave replication system that has a pretty robust 
development cycle. It just reached a 1.0 release.

Whether any solution becomes a core part of the distribution remains, I 
think, to be seen.

-tfo

On Jul 27, 2004, at 4:03 AM, chinni wrote:

>       Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> to postgres.
>
> Did you guys debate on merging it.
>
> As of now They are working on postgres 7.2 and developing postgres-R.
> They plan to do it for 7.4 as well, why not merge these things.
>
> Is the postgres team planing to come up with a similar tool themselves 
> ?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: chinni
Date:
Subject: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.
Next
From: "Thomas Hallgren"
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command