RE: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jamison, Kirk
Subject RE: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
Date
Msg-id D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C65094E1@g01jpexmbkw24
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks  ("Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> I updated the patch based from comments, but it still fails the regression
> test as indicated in (5) above.
> Kindly verify if I correctly addressed the other parts as what you intended.
> 
> Thanks again for the review!
> I'll update the patch again after further comments.

I updated the patch which is similar to V3 of the patch,
but addressing my problem in (5) in the previous email regarding FreeSpaceMapVacuumRange.
It seems to pass the regression test now. Kindly check for validation.
Thank you!

Regards,
Kirk Jamison

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Replacing the EDH SKIP primes
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process