Feature - Index support on an lquery field (from the ltree module) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Belle
Subject Feature - Index support on an lquery field (from the ltree module)
Date
Msg-id D082EBDF-8F15-4AB5-831F-6744AB1B3714@codewhite.com.au
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Feature - Index support on an lquery field (from the ltree module)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi <div class=""><br class="" /></div><div class="">Forgive me if this is not the right place to discuss this. I am new
tothe postgresql community.</div><div class=""><br class="" /></div><div class="">I have a requirement for a project
thatI am working on and was hoping to gain some discussion on the idea of implementing an index type for lquery fields
(seeltree’s <a class=""
href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ltree.html">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ltree.html</a>)</div><div
class=""><brclass="" /></div><div class="">Currently ltree fields can have GIST/GIN indexes, but you cannot create a
indexfor lquery or ltxtquery. In my scope, an index for lquery would be enough, although if it wasn’t too difficult it
forto be expanded for ltxtquery fields, then this could also be implemented. </div><div class=""><br class=""
/></div><divclass="">I have not contributed to postgres yet so I’m not really sure how to get started. </div><div
class=""><brclass="" /></div><div class="">Thoughts?</div><div class=""><br class="" /></div><div class=""><br class=""
/></div><divclass=""><br class="" /></div><div class=""><br class="" /></div><div class=""><br class="" /></div><div
class=""><brclass="" /></div> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c