On Wed Jul 12, 2023 at 10:52 PM CDT, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:29:35AM -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> > On Wed Jul 12, 2023 at 1:06 AM CDT, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> This would use the freeze option only on pgbench_accounts when no
> >> partitioning is defined, but my point was a bit different. We could
> >> use the FREEZE option on the teller and branch tables as well, no?
> >> Okay, the impact is limited compared to accounts in terms of amount of
> >> data loaded, but perhaps some people like playing with large scaling
> >> factors where this could show a benefit in the initial data loading.
> >
> > Perhaps, should they all be keyed off the same option? Seemed like in
> > your previous comment you wanted multiple options. Sorry for not reading
> > your comment correctly.
>
> I would have though that --partition should only apply to the
> pgbench_accounts table, while FREEZE should apply where it is possible
> to use it, aka all the COPY queries except when pgbench_accounts is a
> partition. Would you do something different, like not applying FREEZE
> to pgbench_tellers and pgbench_branches as these have much less tuples
> than pgbench_accounts?
Michael,
I think I completely misunderstood you. From what I can tell, you want
to use FREEZE wherever possible. I think the new patch covers your
comment and fixes the documentation. I am hoping that I have finally
gotten what you are looking for.
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
