Re: abi-compliance-checker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tristan Partin
Subject Re: abi-compliance-checker
Date
Msg-id CTARXHXB8UW7.2PQEWYP1PSSN5@gonk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: abi-compliance-checker  ("Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon Jun 12, 2023 at 10:10 AM CDT, Tristan Partin wrote:
> On Sat Jun 10, 2023 at 9:17 AM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I have rearranged this a bit.  There are now two build options, called
> > abidw and abidiff.  The abidw option produces the xml file, that you
> > would then at appropriate times commit into the tree as the base.  The
> > abidiff option enables the abidiff tests.  This doesn't actually require
> > abidw, since abidiff can compare the binary directly against the
> > recorded XML file.  So these options are distinct and nonoverlapping.
> >
> > Note that in this setup, you still need a conditional around the abidiff
> > test() call, because otherwise meson setup will fail if the base file
> > doesn't exist (yet), so it would be impossible to bootstrap this system.
>
> Could you speak more to the workflow you see with managing the checked
> in diff files?

Just saw your other email which talks about the workflow.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-checker
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL