Hi Fujii-san
> It would be more appropriate to use
> <filename>, <structname>, and <command> instead.
```
- following fields. See <literal>PlannedStmt</literal> in
- <literal>nodes/plannodes.h</literal> for additional detail.
+ following fields. See <structname>PlannedStmt</structname> in
+ <filename>nodes/plannodes.h</filename> for additional detail.
```
Switching to <filename> here makes sense. While looking through the SGML files,
I noticed that the way header file paths are written is a bit inconsistent across the documentation.
In many places we use full paths including src/include, for example in fdw_handler.sgml and create_type.sgml:
```
in <filename>src/include/nodes/plannodes.h</filename>, and the comments for
<type>ExecRowMark</type> in <filename>src/include/nodes/execnodes.h</filename> for
```
But in a few files, such as pgoverexplain.sgml (this patch), spi.sgml,
and xfunc.sgml, the paths are written without the src/include/ prefix.
I’m fine with the change as-is; just wanted to ask whether you’d like to use
this patch to address that inconsistency, or keep the existing style in this file.
Regards,
Shixin Wang.
