Re: BUG #16222: [[:print:]] doesn't correctly handle Emoji skin tonemodifiers on MacOS - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Mack Earnhardt
Subject Re: BUG #16222: [[:print:]] doesn't correctly handle Emoji skin tonemodifiers on MacOS
Date
Msg-id CEAD1A96-7A6F-4B52-AC96-C1C6C5266437@agilereasoning.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16222: [[:print:]] doesn't correctly handle Emoji skin tone modifiers on MacOS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Tom,

You’re correct. I thought the fact that Terminal and Vim both display correct-ish was enough to rule out the OS. It
wasn’t.

The database LC_CTYPE is set to en_US.UTF-8, as is my bash terminal. When I put the two queries in a text file and use
`egrep'^[[:print:]]+$’`, only the first line is recognized. 

Thanks for helping me narrow this down!

-M

> On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
>> On Linux heroku-18, these expressions both eval true:
>
>> select '✌'~'\A[[:print:]]*\Z';
>> select '✌🏻'~'\A[[:print:]]*\Z';
>
>> On MacOS Catalina, the 1st evals true but the 2nd evals false.
>
> This is entirely a function of what your operating system's
> locale support does.  So it could be that you chose the wrong
> LC_CTYPE setting for the macOS database -- in C locale, for
> example, "false" is the right answer.  However, we've observed
> that macOS's UTF8-based locales seem pretty brain-dead about
> handling of multibyte characters :-(.  So it's likely that this
> boils down to being Apple's bug.  I haven't detected any interest
> on their part in improving their POSIX locale support, unfortunately.
>
>             regards, tom lane




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16222: [[:print:]] doesn't correctly handle Emoji skin tone modifiers on MacOS
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY unexpectedly fails