Re: [pgsql-www] commitfest.postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] commitfest.postgresql.org
Date
Msg-id CDF015F4-CC92-4883-B7F0-565AC881D804@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] commitfest.postgresql.org  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 3, 2009, at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>>>> It seems to be inconsistent.  Probably because everything wound up
>>>> with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing.
>
>> I think what you guys must be seeing is that the topics are not in
>> quite the same order.  As far as I can tell, the ordering of patches
>> within topics is absolutely identical.
>
> No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
> single patch.  If you look at
> http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=2
> in some cases there are Comments before the Patch itself, and in
> some cases after, but more often than not the original Patch is
> at the bottom.

Oh, duh.  I totally missed that.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: single bit integer (TINYINT) revisited for 8.5
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation