Re: List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Max
Subject Re: List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)
Date
Msg-id CDEJIJMPHJJNHGFMBPBKOEKMFDAA.maxdl@adelphia.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)  (Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
>
> barbara@bookpro.com wrote in news:10outlgpkitaq20@corp.supernews.com:
>
> >>The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql
> >>groups for consideration to be included into the big 8.  However there
> >>are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be
> >>there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly
> >>doubt Marc would want to eliminate them.

I think Marc understands by now that these lists won't be eliminated. It's a
parallel process. Let's start with a few and create the other groups down
the road. An RFD with 21 groups has a good chance to be rejected, not
because they are not relevant, just because it's too many at one time. I
assume a second RFD should be 'filed' in 6 months with the remaining groups,
and should be nothing more than a cruise.

Nax



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dawid Kuroczko
Date:
Subject: Re: How many secondary databases can I create?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: The classic "NEW used in query that is not in a rule" problem again