Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitrios Apostolou
Subject Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CDECDCD3-4A23-4FE6-A815-E23AFEC1D008@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 15 April 2025 18:18:41 CEST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net> writes:
>> I only got the "ERROR: deadlock detected" message once, with pg_restore
>> compiled from master branch.
>
>Oh, hmm ... do you recall just when on the master branch?  I'm
>wondering if it was before or after 14e87ffa5 (2024-11-08).
>If it was after, then it might have been subject to the same
>issue with not-null constraints that I ran into.
>
>            regards, tom lane

Definitely after.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add estimated hit ratio to Memoize in EXPLAIN to explain cost adjustment
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Add \dAt [AMPTRN [TBLPTRN]] to list tables by Table Access Method in psql