Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT
Date
Msg-id CDA8E47D-83B8-4EEA-86DA-19C5AF1BE0B3@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/4/20, 1:47 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On the UI of this patch, you're proposing to add the option FAST.  I'm
> not a fan of this option name and propose that (if we have it) we use
> the name SPREAD instead (defaults to false).
>
> Now we don't actually explain the term "spread" much in the documentation;
> we just say "the writes are spread".  But it seems more natural to build
> on that adjective rather than "fast/slow".

Here is a version of the patch that uses SPREAD instead of FAST.

Nathan


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of operator_precedence_warning
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT