Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Pietro Pugni
Subject Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CC75431A-0CCC-48FF-BB2D-9694272AD7B4@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL  (Josh Krupka <jkrupka@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi Josh,
at the moment the server is unreachable so I can’t calculate sizes. I run all of my test both with all data loaded into
Postgresand with no data loaded (except from the single 20mln rows table with relative indexes). 
To give you an idea, with all data loaded into Postgres with indexes the space occupied is approximately 1.2-1.5TB and
freespace on is about 800GB. 

Many thanks.
Best regads,
 Pietro

Il giorno 03/apr/2015, alle ore 17:21, Josh Krupka <jkrupka@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Sorry, how much disk space is actually used by the tables, indexes, etc involved in your queries? Or it that's a bit
muchto get, how much disk space is occupied by your database in total? 



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Krupka
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Next
From: Mel Llaguno
Date:
Subject: Re: Some performance testing?