Re: Fast request for version checking.... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mohan, Ross
Subject Re: Fast request for version checking....
Date
Msg-id CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DB2E@vamail01.thexchange.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Fast request for version checking....  ("Mohan, Ross" <RMohan@arbinet.com>)
Responses Re: Fast request for version checking....
List pgsql-general
I have 2.53, yes.

But, I am going to rebuild and re-AC this, so need
to build m4 (1.4.3) in order to get to 2.59 of AConf.


Any reasons to strongly advocate or avoid forcing
compiler into strict ANSI/C99 or ISO C mode? I had
to do that to get m4 to compile. I'd like to stay
on a single track (ANSI compliant or not) with all
builds.

An RTFM pointer to a doc would be more than ample,
if such explanation already exists!

Thanks!!




-----Original Message-----
From:    Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent:    Fri 27-May-05 8:35 PM
To:    Mohan, Ross
Cc:    pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject:    Re: [GENERAL] Fast request for version checking....
"Mohan, Ross" <RMohan@arbinet.com> writes:
> if you go to the root of your postgresql distro
> and type
> ./configure --version
> what version of AutoConf was used?

For any reasonably recent PG release, it will be 2.53 if built from
source.  Some RPM distributions may have re-autoconf'd though (I think
Red Hat is currently using 2.59, for instance).

            regards, tom lane




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Clodoaldo Pinto
Date:
Subject: kernels performance difference
Next
From: Neil Dugan
Date:
Subject: Re: table synonyms