On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 3:31 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/3/26 13:21, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 2:18 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> What is the reason for the second change? Tender, can you show us how to
> >> reproduce the issue so we can support your update to
> >> restrict_infos_logically_equal? If we include it, we should add a test.
> >
> > I think Tender already shown this in [1]. The same qual is present
> > twice in the plan.
> Got it. I suggest making this a separate commit to keep the history
> clear. Let me share a draft with a test case for the bug fix first.
Yes, I was also thinking about splitting this into two distinct
commit. The patch you've attached looks good for me. I'm going to
push and backpatch it if no objections. And let's continue the
investigation on restrict_infos_logically_equal().
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase