Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdvpzBFs5=93USnjvMaLE8VXOTk5r2Sr+X3z9M03xD9Fng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
On 07/21/2015 02:56 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Probably, but currently we are in quite unlogical situation. We have
default fillfactor = 90 for GiST where it has no use cases at all and
effectively is just a waste of space.

Why is it useless for GiST?

It's because all of GiST pages are produced by page splits. So, just after CREATE INDEX GiST pages aren't tightly packed in average. Actually, they could be tightly packed by incredible coincidence, but for large indexes it's quite safe assumption that they are not. With GiST we don't have storm of page splits after index creation with fillfactor = 100. So, why should we reserve additional space with fillfactor = 90?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: creating extension including dependencies
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.