Re: jsonpath versus NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdveGwW8iQ_PPhaN-uD99CP3eh-Pd91+o-qG0XWpMXjneA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath versus NaN  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm going to push 0002 if there is no objection.
> > Regarding 0001, I think my new error messages need review.
>
> I do intend to review these, just didn't get to it yet.

OK, that you for noticing.  I wouldn't push anything before your review.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Re: change a function name in a comment correctly