On Monday 09 November 2015 13:50:20 Pavel Stehule wrote: > New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation. > > If some functionality can be implemented via functions without performance > impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for > corner use cases. > > Regards > > Pavel
Ok we can use {:} instead [:] for zero array access. The function is the solution half.
It isn't solution. The any syntax/behave change have to have stronger motivation. We had so talk about it 20 years ago :(
Assuming array[~n] has a current meaning, could we give a try to new syntax which doesn't have current meaning? Not yet sure what exactly it could be...
------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
