Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdvJd8mqu3NkRHE_G9uJmru2O9t6S0_xyLndO-DsXNN47Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> > I've rechecked that the now patched code branch is covered by
> > regression tests.  I think the memory leak issue is independent of the
> > computational errors we've observed.
> > So, I'm going to push and backpatch this if no objections.
>
> +1.  We should work on the roundoff-error issue as well, but
> as you say, it's an independent problem.

Pushed, thank you.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.