Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdvDs-sLtkh77zU8O2mpg5139YBcdG1iurT8psD1dndn6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-03-02 01:48:03 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Also, the last commitfest is already too late for such big changes.
> So, I'm marking this RWF.

Agreed.  Perhaps extract the 64bit GUC patch and track that separately?
Seems like something we should just do...

Sounds reasonable.  But I didn't notice if there are other users for 64bit GUCs
besides 64bit xids?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication