On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:32 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:24 PM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2018-Dec-27, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
> >
> > > To summarize:
> > >
> > > 1) Alvaro and Michael agreed, that REINDEX with tablespace move may be
> > > useful. This is done in the patch attached to my initial email. Adding
> > > REINDEX to ALTER TABLE as new action seems quite questionable for me and not
> > > completely semantically correct. ALTER already looks bulky.
> >
> > Agreed on these points.
>
> As an alternative idea, I think we can have a new ALTER INDEX variants
> that rebuilds the index while moving tablespace, something like ALTER
> INDEX ... REBUILD SET TABLESPACE ....
+1
It seems the easiest way to have feature-full commands. If we put
functionality of CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL to ALTER TABLE, and put
functionality of REINDEX to ALTER INDEX, then CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and
REINDEX would be just syntax sugar.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
