Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdu_txw9UQ+wWYaHZoHTwt8sONUCoX2MPMakt+5iNh6wmQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded  (Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Xuneng!

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 6:46 AM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com> wrote:
> Remove the erroneous WAIT_LSN_TYPE_COUNT case from the switch
> statement in v5 patch 1.

Thank you for your work on this patchset.  Generally, it looks like
good and quite straightforward extension of the current functionality.
But this patch adds 4 new unreserved keywords to our grammar.  Do you
think we can put mode into with options clause?

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel Apply
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class