Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdu6roOVEUsV9TWNdQ=TZCrNEEwJM62EQiKULUyjpERhtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:30 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Additionally, I think if we start recording role OID, then we need a
> full set of management clauses for each individual option ownership.
> Otherwise, we would leave this new role OID without necessarily
> management facilities.  But with them, the whole stuff will look like
> awful overengineering.

I can also predict a lot of ambiguous cases.  For instance, we
existing setting can be overridden with a different role OID.  If it
has been overridden can the overwriter turn it back?

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation