Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdu3saDk8A1YHL48LfNVN8Uojvmf4m2h_J4cyB9vKxWaWw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I've applied patch on top of c12d570f and rerun the same benchmarks.
> CSV-file with results is attached.  There is no dramatical changes.  There
> is still minority of performance regression cases while majority of cases
> has improvement.

Yes, I think these results look pretty good.  But are these times in
seconds?  You might need to do some testing with bigger sorts.

Good point.  I'll rerun benchmarks with larger dataset size.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] list of credits for release notes