On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 2:48 PM Ayush Tiwari
<ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 17:01, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I suggest another approach. Create a separate test database and apply
>> event trigger on it. wait_for_catchup() and others use 'postgres'
>> database and wouldn't touch our test database.
>> I also added check for successful clearance of the flag on both
>> primary and standby. One issue spotted there: in-place heap update
>> doesn't issue a WAL flush. But I think that's minor, WAL could be
>> flushed by any subsequent operation.
>
>
> I agree the approach you are suggesting is better.
>
> Patch looks good to me!
Thank you. I'm going to push and backpatch it if no objections.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase