Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsyZYU7fV-Yp8uWbrOnxXL954rUA3Z3VqjoP=DyoqJdzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
Described differences leads to incorrect behaviour of GiST index. 
The question is: what is correct way to fix it? Should on_pb also use FP* or consistent method should behave like on_pb?

Any comments on this? Current behaviour definitely indicates a bug, and I'm ready to fix it. The only question: is this bug in on_pb or gist?

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code? Call for mentors.