On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 8:15 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 09:45:26AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 3:28 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I took a quick glance at the patch. My initial comment is: it only
> >> includes the test case discussed here, but I think it's a good idea to
> >> add more cases in it (that exercise code paths in
> >> postgresRecheckForeignScan), as I mentioned upthread. What do you
> >> think about that? If no objections, I'd like to update it to include
> >> such cases.
> >
> > +1 to add more test cases for the code paths in postgresRecheckForeignScan.
>
> +1. Would these be included in the same isolation test? That may be
> cleaner, especially as it seems like the EPQ re-evaluations should be
> able to happen with the same schema as the one set up by the test.
Yes, I will add those cases to the same isolation test, as you mentioned.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita