On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I think if it had been a clear, enforced goal all along, it might've been
possible to build the system with such a restriction (for the most part at least). At this point though, the amount of work and code churn involved seems like it'd far exceed the benefits.
That makes sense to me. I certainly didn't think it was a slam-dunk that what I was proposing would be an improvement. It just seemed like a question worth asking. Thanks for your thoughts.
