Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Angelico
Subject Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Date
Msg-id CAPTjJmp0-4omUTUZRj28ZgS_nX_9=5ViOf11xkMJW52L5G=m+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> You might want to look at the hackers list thread I started about the
> same topic a week before your post:
>
>         http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-07/msg00416.php
>
> Basically, you can only use mtime/size if you are replaying WAL.

I'll check that out in a bit; but hot standby includes replaying WAL,
right? That's what we're doing - full live replication with
possibility to "pg_ctl promote" a slave straight up to master.

ChrisA

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL : could not read directory base": Invalid argument