[pgAgent][Patch] Fixing connection pool leak - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Rob Emery
Subject [pgAgent][Patch] Fixing connection pool leak
Date
Msg-id CAPCETptk-Z5+9=o5YWwt9MLmxnknLiHeeu292jZi2ZP3FEp4DA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [pgAgent][Patch] Fixing connection pool leak
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi,

Following on from https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BOCxoz4tONxSpd1rdU-9SPKRzucz8Bar2CXkEDnCwV6H77ZyA%40mail.gmail.com

I think I've identified and fixed the issue, please see the patch attached.

As I understand it when there are multiple pgagent instances and they clash executing a job (i.e rc != 1 on job.cpp:38), the loser of the conflict's thread will never be executed (i.e. job.cpp:418 JobThread::Entry), which is responsible for deleting the job owned by the thread, meaning that the connection is never returned to the pool. By moving the delete of the job into the destructor, we can assure that the connection is tidied up in both cases as the thread is deleted in the error case explicitly in pgAgent.cpp:185.

The only possibly unintended difference that I can see with doing this is that the log "Completed job: %s" is now output when before it wasn't, however I think this new behaviour is actually correct as the job object is completed at that time.

Thanks,
Rob






Phone: 0800 021 0888   Email: contactus@codeweavers.net
Codeweavers Ltd | Barn 4 | Dunston Business Village | Dunston | ST18 9AB
Registered in England and Wales No. 04092394 | VAT registration no. 974 9705 63 


    https://plus.google.com/b/105942302039373248738/+CodeweaversNet  https://twitter.com/CodeweaversTeam
Attachment

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: pgadmin4 l10n issues
Next
From: Ashesh Vashi
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgAgent][Patch] Fixing connection pool leak