Re: refresh materialized view concurrently - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hitoshi Harada
Subject Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
Date
Msg-id CAP7Qgm=qJcDcDPy19_L6+jBwzSFEcGhVws5qFdgEYTqQT244Sg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: refresh materialized view concurrently  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks again!  New patch attached.
>

After a couple of more attempts trying to break it, I mark this as
ready to go.  One small question:  why do we use multiple unique
indexes if exist?  One index isn't enough?

--
Hitoshi Harada



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext