Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lukas Fittl
Subject Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Date
Msg-id CAP53PkybGzJTAo7V07ssUae5047pBY3jc_F07tGY13cNhqe+AQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage  (Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>)
Responses Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

Attached v12, rebased, otherwise no changes.

I realize time to freeze is getting close, and whilst I'd love to see
this go in, I'm also realistic - so I'll just do my best to support
review in the off chance we can make it for this release.

On that note, I think 0001 and 0002 are independently useful
refactorings to split the different kinds of instrumentation that
should be ready to go, and I don't think should conflict much with
other patches in this commitfest.

Thanks,
Lukas

--
Lukas Fittl
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florents Tselai
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Add tsmatch JSONPath operator for granular Full Text Search
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]