Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:49 AM Jim Nasby <nasbyj@amazon.com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of trying to improve scheduling (especially allowing users
> to control how things are scheduled), but that's a far more invasive
> patch. I'd like to get something like this patch in without waiting on a
> significantly larger effort.
BTW, Have you tried the patch suggested in the thread below?
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180629.173418.190173462.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp
The above is a suggestion to manage statistics on shared memory rather
than in a file, but I think this feature may mitigate your problem.
I think that feature has yet another performance challenge, but it
might be worth a try.
The above patch will also require a great deal of effort to get into
the PostgreSQL-core, but I'm curious to see how well it works for this
problem.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com
