Re: 9.4 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nicolas Barbier
Subject Re: 9.4 release notes
Date
Msg-id CAP-rdTa-S6BAnb6zMmqc1kFfZhnMEuM_LKTAaPJ+-8GTR=77rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.4 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: 9.4 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
2014-05-05 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:

> On Mon, May  5, 2014 at 10:40:29AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> * ALTER SYSTEM SET
>>
>> Lemme know if you need description text for any of the above.
>
> OK, great!  Once I have the markup done, I will beef up the descriptions
> if needed and copy the text up to the major items section so we have
> that all ready for beta.

“Add SQL-level command ALTER SYSTEM command [..]”

Using “command” twice sounds weird to my ears. Wouldn’t leaving out
the second instance be better?

Nicolas

--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] `pg_dump -Fd` doesn't check write return status...