Re: Missing optimization when filters are applied after window functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nicolas Barbier
Subject Re: Missing optimization when filters are applied after window functions
Date
Msg-id CAP-rdTY0L34RrekgsEa3sTXKR3hexzoaiJJ=0eWh319+X9x=9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing optimization when filters are applied after window functions  (Volker Grabsch <vog@notjusthosting.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2012/5/17 Volker Grabsch <vog@notjusthosting.com>:

> Also, is there any chance to include a (simple) attempt of
> such an optimiztation into PostgreSQL-9.2 beta, or is this
> only a possible topic for 9.3 and later?

For 9.2, you’re about 4 months late :-). The last commitfest was in Januari:

<URL:https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=13>

Nicolas

--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Next
From: Joshua Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is indexonlyscan so darned slow?