Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Goti
Subject Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
Date
Msg-id CAOzfMuoA=16216dHM0+dtHdgZbZHTz6LHLRu_RyzVX6+5CtO9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?  (Dan Smith <j.daniel.smith1@gmail.com>)
Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this.  Does that mean that I should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here? Please correct me if I am wrong!
Thanks,

Goti


On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
>
> Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal buffers
> or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like to
> understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.

It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask Amazon,
not us.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
Next
From: Dan Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?