Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Goti
Subject Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
Date
Msg-id CAOzfMuo7fp5wN-x7XVqrqF_UErvCGt83vpa0ks++cC6wkcfEdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Thanks a lot Dan , Julien and Ron for your inputs.

On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 8:51 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can't find it in the documentation, then dba.stackexchange would be the place to ask.


On 2/6/22 7:43 AM, Goti wrote:
Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this.  Does that mean that I should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here? Please correct me if I am wrong!
Thanks,

Goti


On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
>
> Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal buffers
> or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like to
> understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.

It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask Amazon,
not us.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
--
Thanks,

Goti

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Vijaykumar Jain
Date:
Subject: Re: restarting logical replication after upgrading standby
Next
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: autovacuum default run with vacuum_index_cleanup and vacuum_truncate and related lock?